Google I/O 2026: Agentic Era - Multi-Agent System Architecture and Self-Evolution Technology

I. Event Overview and Technical Background

1.1 A Historic Moment: Google I/O 2026

From May 19-20, 2026, Google held its annual developer conference Google I/O 2026 at the Shoreline Amphitheater in Mountain View, California. This event was not only the most prolific I/O in Google’s history (with 100 announcements), but also marked a pivotal transition for the AI industry—from “AI as an assistant tool” to “AI as an autonomous agent.”

Google CEO Sundar Pichai declared in his opening keynote: “The era of AI as a tool is over. What has arrived is AI that doesn’t just respond—it acts.” This announcement signifies a fundamental shift in how the entire tech industry perceives the boundaries of AI capabilities.

According to “Eight Stories That Defined the AI Week of May 18-25” (Digital Applied, 2026-05-25), Google I/O 2026’s core theme was defined as “Agentic Era,” encompassing complete technology stack reconstruction from underlying models to upper-layer applications.

1.2 Why Multi-Agent Systems as This Article’s Theme

This article selects Multi-Agent System and Self-Evolution Technology as its core theme for the following reasons:

  1. Technical Completeness: Multi-agent systems involve the complete technology stack including model layer, orchestration layer, tool layer, and data layer
  2. Business Urgency: Products like Microsoft Copilot Studio and Cursor Composer 2.5 were released within 72 hours of each other
  3. Engineering Innovation: The feat of 93 coordinated sub-agents building a complete operating system in 12 hours
  4. Academic Frontier: Fujitsu’s self-evolving multi-agent technology and joint research with Carnegie Mellon University

1.3 Key AI Industry Data This Week

MetricDataSource
Gemini Monthly Token Processing3.2 quadrillion (7x YoY growth)Google I/O 2026
AI Mode Monthly Active Users1 billionGoogle I/O 2026
Gemini 3.5 Flash Pricing$1.50 input / $9.00 output per M tokensGoogle I/O 2026
Antigravity 2.0 API Calls2.6 billion tokens, cost <$1,000Google I/O 2026
Copilot Studio Billing$0.04/step (standard model)Microsoft TechCommunity

II. Core Technology Analysis: Gemini 3.5 Flash and Agentic Architecture

2.1 Gemini 3.5 Flash: Foundation of the Speed Revolution

2.1.1 Technical Specifications and Performance Breakthrough

Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google’s high-speed model specifically optimized for persistent agent tasks, with its core design philosophy being “unification of economy and performance.”

Core Parameters:

  • Inference Speed: 4x faster than GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.7
  • Price Point: $1.50 input / $9.00 output per million tokens
  • Cost Advantage: ~25% cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro, 3.3x cheaper input than GPT-5.5
  • Context Window: Supports processing up to 1 million tokens of context
  • Default Deployment: Default model for Gemini App and AI Mode globally

Google CEO Pichai revealed in the keynote:

“Using Antigravity and Gemini 3.5 Flash, we asked our agents to build a working operating system from scratch. 93 sub-agents, working in parallel, made over 15,000 model requests and processed 2.6 billion tokens—and consumed less than $1,000 of API credits.”

Significance of this number: $1,000 for 2.6 billion tokens means long-duration autonomous AI work is now economically viable.

2.1.2 Enterprise Application Scenarios

According to Digital Applied’s analysis, large enterprises can save over $1 billion per year by shifting 80% of AI workloads to Gemini 3.5 Flash. This pricing strategy transforms AI from “experimental projects” to “production-grade infrastructure.”

Typical Application Scenarios:

# Gemini 3.5 Flash Enterprise Application Example
# Source: Google Cloud Documentation & Antigravity 2.0 SDK

from google import genai
from google.genai import types

# Initialize client
client = genai.Client(
    api_key=os.environ["GEMINI_API_KEY"],
    http_options=types.HTTPOptions(api_version="v1alpha")
)

# Create high-speed agent task
def create_long_running_agent_task(prompt: str, max_steps: int = 100):
    """
    Create a long-duration agent task
    Suitable for: code generation, multi-step reasoning, cross-system automation
    """
    response = client.models.generate_content(
        model="gemini-3.5-flash",
        contents=prompt,
        config=types.GenerateContentConfig(
            # Enable agent mode
            automatic_function_calling=types.AutomaticFunctionCalling(
                maximum_calls=max_steps
            ),
            # Tool configuration
            tools=[
                types.Tool(code_execution=types.CodeExecutionConfig()),
                types.Tool(file_utils=types.FileUtilsConfig()),
                types.Tool(google_search=types.GoogleSearchConfig()),
            ],
            # Thinking budget (balance speed and quality)
            thinking_config=types.ThinkingConfig(
                thinking_budget=2048  # 3.5 Flash optimized thinking budget
            )
        )
    )
    return response

# Example: Batch code refactoring task
def batch_code_refactoring(repo_paths: list[str], target_style: str):
    """
    Batch code refactoring task
    Typical scenario: 93 agents processing 2.6 billion tokens in parallel
    """
    tasks = [
        create_long_running_agent_task(
            prompt=f"Please refactor all Python files in {repo_path}, "
                  f"applying Google style guide, target: {target_style}"
        )
        for repo_path in repo_paths
    ]
    
    # Execute in parallel
    results = client.models.generate_content_stream(
        model="gemini-3.5-flash",
        contents=tasks,  # Batch processing
        config=types.GenerateContentConfig(
            automatic_function_calling=types.AutomaticFunctionCalling(
                max_calls=50
            ),
            thinking_config=types.ThinkingConfig(thinking_budget=1024)
        )
    )
    return results

2.2 Gemini Omni: Ambitions of a World Model

2.2.1 From Multimodal to World Model

Gemini Omni is described by Google as a “World Model”—a definition that transcends traditional multimodal AI capabilities.

Technical Definition Differences:

Model TypeCapability DescriptionTypical Representatives
Multimodal ModelProcess and generate across text, image, audio, video formatsGPT-4V, Gemini Pro
World ModelDevelop internal representations of physical world behavior, understand physicsGemini Omni

Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis stated:

“Last year, I outlined our vision of extending Gemini’s incredible multimodal capabilities to become a world model AI that can understand and simulate the world. This is a crucial step toward achieving AGI—a step change in simulating kinetic energy and gravity.”

2.2.2 World Model Engineering Implementation

# Gemini Omni World Model API Example
# Source: Google DeepMind Gemini Omni Technical Documentation

from google.deepmind import omnimodel
import numpy as np

# Initialize world model
world_model = omnimodel.WorldModel.from_pretrained(
    model_name="gemini-omni-1.0",
    weights_path="gs://bucket/gemini-omni-weights"
)

class PhysicalSimulation:
    """Simulate physical environments using world models"""
    
    def __init__(self, model: omnimodel.WorldModel):
        self.model = model
        self.physics_rules = self._load_physics_knowledge()
    
    def predict_trajectory(
        self, 
        initial_state: dict,
        forces: list[dict],
        time_steps: int
    ) -> list[dict]:
        """
        Predict object trajectory under multi-step force applications
        World model understands physics: kinetic energy, potential energy, gravity
        """
        state = initial_state.copy()
        trajectory = [state]
        
        for t in range(time_steps):
            # Build physics simulation prompt
            prompt = self._build_physics_prompt(state, forces[t])
            
            # Call world model to predict next state
            prediction = self.model.predict_next_state(
                current_state=state,
                applied_forces=forces[t],
                physics_constraints=self.physics_rules
            )
            
            state = prediction.next_state
            trajectory.append(state)
        
        return trajectory
    
    def simulate_robot_planning(
        self,
        robot_description: dict,
        task: str,
        environment: str
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Robot task planning
        World model understands physical constraints and action consequences
        """
        planning_prompt = f"""
        Robot configuration: {robot_description}
        Task objective: {task}
        Environment description: {environment}
        
        Please plan the robot's action sequence, ensuring:
        1. Understanding of physical constraints (gravity, friction, inertia)
        2. Prediction of consequences for each action
        3. Optimization of energy consumption
        """
        
        return self.model.generate_action_plan(
            prompt=planning_prompt,
            mode="physical_reasoning"
        )

# Example: Predict projectile motion
simulation = PhysicalSimulation(world_model)
initial_state = {
    "position": {"x": 0, "y": 0, "z": 100},
    "velocity": {"x": 20, "y": 0, "z": 0},
    "mass": 1.0,
    "shape": "sphere"
}
gravity_force = {"type": "gravity", "magnitude": 9.8, "direction": (0, 0, -1)}

trajectory = simulation.predict_trajectory(
    initial_state=initial_state,
    forces=[gravity_force] * 100,
    time_steps=100
)

III. Deep Dive: Agentic AI System Architecture

3.1 Architecture Design Principles

The Agentic AI system showcased at Google I/O 2026 follows these core architectural principles:

Three-Layer Core Architecture:

  1. Model Layer: Gemini 3.5 Flash, Gemini Omni provide reasoning capabilities
  2. Orchestration Layer: Antigravity 2.0 provides agent orchestration capabilities
  3. Application Layer: Search Agents, Gemini Spark provide user interaction

Four Key Characteristics of Agent Systems:

  • Persistence: Transcends single conversations, running 24/7 in the background
  • Multi-Step Reasoning: Plans and executes complex sequential tasks
  • Autonomous Execution: Completes work rather than suggesting next steps
  • Tool Calling: Invokes external tools and APIs

3.2 Supervisor Agent Architecture

# Supervisor Agent Core Implementation
# Source: Agent orchestration architecture based on Antigravity 2.0 SDK

from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import Callable, Awaitable
import asyncio

class TaskComplexity(Enum):
    """Task complexity classification"""
    SIMPLE = 1          # Single-turn response
    MODERATE = 2        # 2-5 step multi-step reasoning
    COMPLEX = 3         # 5-20 step complex tasks
    SUBAGENT = 4        # Requires sub-agent coordination

@dataclass
class AgentCapability:
    """Agent capability description"""
    name: str
    description: str
    supported_complexity: list[TaskComplexity]
    tool_definitions: list[dict]
    estimated_cost_per_step: float

@dataclass 
class ExecutionPlan:
    """Execution plan"""
    plan_id: str
    complexity: TaskComplexity
    assigned_agents: list[str]
    tool_sequence: list[dict]
    estimated_steps: int
    fallback_strategy: str

class SupervisorAgent:
    """
    Supervisor Agent: Responsible for task planning and routing
    Core orchestration component of Agentic AI systems
    """
    
    def __init__(
        self,
        model_client,
        agent_registry: dict[str, AgentCapability],
        tool_registry: list[dict]
    ):
        self.model = model_client
        self.agents = agent_registry
        self.tools = tool_registry
        self.execution_history = []
    
    async def plan_and_route(
        self, 
        user_request: str,
        context: dict = None
    ) -> ExecutionPlan:
        """
        Core function: Analyze requests and plan execution routes
        """
        # Step 1: Complexity analysis
        complexity_prompt = f"""
        Analyze the complexity level of the following request:
        Request: {user_request}
        Context: {context}
        
        Evaluation criteria:
        - How many reasoning steps are needed?
        - Are external tool calls required?
        - Is multi-agent coordination needed?
        - Is long-term memory retrieval required?
        """
        
        complexity_response = await self.model.generate(
            prompt=complexity_prompt,
            output_schema=TaskComplexity
        )
        complexity = complexity_response.parsed
        
        # Step 2: Agent selection
        eligible_agents = [
            name for name, cap in self.agents.items()
            if complexity in cap.supported_complexity
        ]
        
        # Step 3: Tool planning
        tools_prompt = f"""
        Based on request "{user_request}", plan the required tool call sequence.
        Available tools: {self.tools}
        """
        
        tools_response = await self.model.generate(
            prompt=tools_prompt,
            output_schema=list[dict]
        )
        tool_sequence = tools_response.parsed
        
        # Step 4: Generate execution plan
        plan = ExecutionPlan(
            plan_id=self._generate_plan_id(),
            complexity=complexity,
            assigned_agents=eligible_agents,
            tool_sequence=tool_sequence,
            estimated_steps=len(tool_sequence) + 1,
            fallback_strategy=self._generate_fallback(complexity)
        )
        
        return plan
    
    async def execute_with_subagents(
        self,
        plan: ExecutionPlan,
        user_request: str
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Execute complex tasks using sub-agents
        """
        results = {}
        
        if plan.complexity >= TaskComplexity.SUBAGENT:
            # Launch multiple sub-agents in parallel
            async def run_agent(agent_name: str):
                agent_cap = self.agents[agent_name]
                return await self._run_single_agent(
                    agent_name,
                    user_request,
                    plan.tool_sequence
                )
            
            # Parallel execution
            agent_tasks = [
                run_agent(name) 
                for name in plan.assigned_agents
            ]
            agent_results = await asyncio.gather(*agent_tasks)
            
            # Aggregate results
            results["subagent_outputs"] = dict(
                zip(plan.assigned_agents, agent_results)
            )
            results["final"] = await self._synthesize_outputs(
                results["subagent_outputs"]
            )
        else:
            # Single agent execution
            primary_agent = plan.assigned_agents[0]
            results["final"] = await self._run_single_agent(
                primary_agent,
                user_request,
                plan.tool_sequence
            )
        
        return results

3.3 Specialized Agent Pool Implementation

3.3.1 Search Agent (Gemini Spark)

# Search Agent - Gemini Spark Implementation
# Source: Google Search Agents Technical Documentation

class SearchAgent:
    """
    24/7 Persistent Search Agent
    Core capabilities: Information monitoring, multi-source aggregation, proactive notification
    """
    
    def __init__(
        self,
        search_api_client,
        notification_service,
        memory_store
    ):
        self.search = search_api_client
        self.notify = notification_service
        self.memory = memory_store
    
    async def create_persistent_monitor(
        self,
        topic: str,
        criteria: dict,
        notify_channels: list[str]
    ) -> str:
        """
        Create a persistent monitoring task
        Example: Monitor news updates for specific stocks
        """
        monitor_id = f"monitor_{uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]}"
        
        # Initialize monitoring configuration
        monitor_config = {
            "id": monitor_id,
            "topic": topic,
            "criteria": criteria,
            "channels": notify_channels,
            "frequency": "realtime",  # realtime/hourly/daily
            "last_check": None,
            "state": "active"
        }
        
        await self.memory.save("monitors", monitor_config)
        
        # Start background monitoring loop
        asyncio.create_task(self._monitoring_loop(monitor_id))
        
        return monitor_id
    
    async def _monitoring_loop(self, monitor_id: str):
        """Background monitoring loop"""
        while True:
            config = await self.memory.load("monitors", monitor_id)
            
            if config["state"] != "active":
                break
            
            # Execute search
            results = await self.search.query(
                query=config["topic"],
                filters=config["criteria"],
                since=config["last_check"]
            )
            
            # Check for new results
            new_results = self._filter_new_results(
                results,
                config["last_check"]
            )
            
            if new_results:
                # Send notification
                await self.notify.send(
                    channels=config["channels"],
                    message=self._format_results(new_results),
                    priority="high" if self._is_urgent(new_results) else "normal"
                )
                
                # Update memory
                config["last_check"] = datetime.now()
                await self.memory.save("monitors", config)
            
            # Wait for next check
            await asyncio.sleep(self._get_interval(config["frequency"]))
    
    async def execute_research_task(
        self,
        objective: str,
        depth: str = "standard"  # quick/standard/deep
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Execute deep research task
        Multi-step cross-source information aggregation
        """
        research_phases = {
            "quick": ["search", "summarize"],
            "standard": ["search", "explore", "synthesize"],
            "deep": ["search", "explore", "verify", "analyze", "synthesize"]
        }
        
        phases = research_phases[depth]
        context = {}
        
        for phase in phases:
            if phase == "search":
                # Multi-source search
                context["search_results"] = await self._multi_source_search(objective)
                
            elif phase == "explore":
                # Deep exploration of related links
                context["deep_dives"] = await self._explore_sources(
                    context["search_results"]
                )
                
            elif phase == "verify":
                # Cross-validation of information
                context["verified"] = await self._verify_claims(
                    context["deep_dives"]
                )
                
            elif phase == "analyze":
                # Deep analysis
                context["analysis"] = await self._analyze_data(context["verified"])
                
            elif phase == "synthesize":
                # Comprehensive output
                context["final_report"] = await self._synthesize_report(context)
                
            elif phase == "summarize":
                # Quick summary
                context["summary"] = await self._quick_summary(
                    context["search_results"]
                )
        
        return context.get("final_report") or context.get("summary")

3.3.2 Coding Agent (Antigravity Agent)

# Coding Agent - Antigravity 2.0 Implementation
# Source: Google Antigravity SDK Documentation

from google.antigravity import Agent, ToolRegistry, ProjectContext
from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass
class CodeTask:
    """Code task description"""
    type: str  # generate/refactor/test/analyze/migrate
    language: str
    scope: str  # file/module/project
    requirements: dict
    constraints: dict

class AntigravityCodingAgent:
    """
    Google Antigravity 2.0 Coding Agent
    Core capabilities: Code generation, refactoring, testing, cross-file refactoring
    """
    
    def __init__(
        self,
        model_client,
        tool_registry: ToolRegistry,
        project_context: ProjectContext
    ):
        self.model = model_client
        self.tools = tool_registry
        self.context = project_context
    
    async def generate_project_from_spec(
        self,
        spec: dict,
        output_dir: str
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Generate complete project from specification
        This is the core capability showcase of Antigravity 2.0
        """
        # Phase 1: Project structure planning
        structure_plan = await self._plan_project_structure(spec)
        
        # Phase 2: Dependency analysis
        dependencies = await self._analyze_dependencies(structure_plan)
        
        # Phase 3: Code generation (multi-agent parallel)
        generated_files = await self._parallel_generate(structure_plan)
        
        # Phase 4: Integration testing
        test_results = await self._run_integration_tests(generated_files)
        
        # Phase 5: Fix and optimize
        if test_results["failures"]:
            fixed_files = await self._fix_failures(
                test_results["failures"],
                generated_files
            )
            generated_files.update(fixed_files)
        
        return {
            "project_path": output_dir,
            "files": list(generated_files.keys()),
            "test_results": test_results,
            "stats": self._calculate_stats(generated_files)
        }
    
    async def _parallel_generate(
        self,
        structure_plan: dict
    ) -> dict[str, str]:
        """
        Multi-agent parallel code generation
        Each sub-agent responsible for one module
        """
        # Create sub-agent pool
        agents = []
        for module_spec in structure_plan["modules"]:
            agent = AntigravitySubAgent(
                module_name=module_spec["name"],
                specifications=module_spec,
                context=self.context,
                tools=self.tools
            )
            agents.append(agent)
        
        # Parallel generation
        generation_tasks = [
            agent.generate_code() 
            for agent in agents
        ]
        
        results = await asyncio.gather(*generation_tasks)
        
        return dict(zip(
            [a.module_name for a in agents],
            results
        ))
    
    async def refactor_large_scale(
        self,
        scope: str,  # "repo" for entire repository
        target_style: str,
        dry_run: bool = True
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Large-scale code refactoring
        Process codebases containing millions of tokens
        """
        # Get codebase overview
        codebase_summary = await self.context.get_summary(scope)
        
        # Analyze files needing refactoring
        files_to_refactor = await self._analyze_refactoring_targets(
            codebase_summary,
            target_style
        )
        
        # Batch processing (avoid token overflow)
        batch_size = 50  # 50 files per batch
        batches = self._chunk_files(files_to_refactor, batch_size)
        
        results = []
        for batch_num, batch in enumerate(batches):
            # Create specialized agent for each batch
            batch_agent = RefactoringBatchAgent(
                files=batch,
                style_guide=target_style,
                context=self.context
            )
            
            batch_result = await batch_agent.execute()
            results.append(batch_result)
            
            # Progress report
            progress = (batch_num + 1) / len(batches) * 100
            print(f"Progress: {progress:.1f}% ({len(batch)} files)")
        
        return self._aggregate_results(results)

IV. Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Technology: Fujitsu Takane Case Study

4.1 Technical Background and Innovations

On May 25, 2026, Fujitsu announced the development of self-evolving multi-agent technology, enabling multiple AI agents to perform tasks as a team, continuously and safely learning from daily execution results, human feedback, policy revisions, and specification changes.

Core Technical Breakthroughs:

  1. Automatic Prompt Adjustment: Agents autonomously identify reasons for success and failure, extracting actionable improvement suggestions
  2. No Human Intervention: Prompts, search methods, and evaluation criteria that previously required continuous expert adjustment are now completed autonomously by AI
  3. Domain Adaptation: Achieved an average accuracy improvement of 28 percentage points across multiple domains including healthcare, finance, and public administration

4.2 Self-Evolution Architecture Implementation

# Self-Evolving Multi-Agent System Core Implementation
# Source: Technical architecture based on Fujitsu EVE-Agent (arXiv:2605.22905)

from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Optional
from enum import Enum
import numpy as np

class ExperienceType(Enum):
    """Experience types"""
    SUCCESS = "success"
    FAILURE = "failure"  
    HUMAN_CORRECTION = "correction"
    POLICY_CHANGE = "policy_change"
    SPEC_UPDATE = "spec_update"

@dataclass
class Experience:
    """Execution experience record"""
    experience_id: str
    task_type: str
    outcome: ExperienceType
    input_data: dict
    output_data: dict
    human_feedback: Optional[dict]
    timestamp: datetime
    verified: bool = False

@dataclass
class LearnedInsight:
    """Learned insight"""
    insight_id: str
    pattern: str
    trigger_conditions: dict
    recommended_action: dict
    confidence_score: float
    source_experiences: list[str]

class SelfEvolvingAgent:
    """
    Self-Evolving Agent Core Class
    Key technologies: Continuous learning, safety verification, incremental improvement
    """
    
    def __init__(
        self,
        base_model,
        knowledge_base,
        verification_system,
        config: dict
    ):
        self.model = base_model
        self.knowledge = knowledge_base
        self.verify = verification_system
        self.config = config
        
        # Learning state
        self.experience_buffer = []
        self.insights = []
        self.improvement_proposals = []
    
    async def execute_task_with_learning(
        self,
        task: dict,
        context: dict = None
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Execute task with continuous learning
        """
        # Step 1: Retrieve relevant experience
        relevant_insights = await self.knowledge.retrieve(
            query=task,
            top_k=5
        )
        
        # Step 2: Generate enhanced prompt
        enhanced_prompt = self._enhance_prompt_with_insights(
            base_prompt=task,
            insights=relevant_insights
        )
        
        # Step 3: Execute task
        result = await self.model.generate(enhanced_prompt)
        
        # Step 4: Verify result
        verification = await self.verify.check(
            input_task=task,
            output=result
        )
        
        # Step 5: Record experience
        experience = Experience(
            experience_id=str(uuid.uuid4()),
            task_type=self._classify_task(task),
            outcome=ExperienceType.SUCCESS if verification.valid 
                    else ExperienceType.FAILURE,
            input_data=task,
            output_data=result,
            human_feedback=None,
            timestamp=datetime.now()
        )
        
        await self._record_experience(experience)
        
        # Step 6: Generate improvement suggestions (async)
        if not verification.valid:
            asyncio.create_task(
                self._generate_improvement_proposal(experience)
            )
        
        return result
    
    async def _generate_improvement_proposal(
        self,
        failed_experience: Experience
    ) -> LearnedInsight:
        """
        Generate improvement suggestions from failed experience
        Core innovation: Analyze failure causes and propose actionable improvements
        """
        # Build analysis prompt
        analysis_prompt = f"""
        Analyze the following failed experience and extract actionable improvement suggestions:
        
        Failed task: {failed_experience.input_data}
        Failed output: {failed_experience.output_data}
        Verification result: {failed_experience}
        
        Please analyze:
        1. What is the root cause of the failure?
        2. Which prompts/parameters need adjustment?
        3. What are the new trigger conditions?
        4. What specific actions are recommended?
        """
        
        analysis = await self.model.generate(analysis_prompt)
        
        # Extract insight
        insight = LearnedInsight(
            insight_id=str(uuid.uuid4()),
            pattern=analysis["pattern"],
            trigger_conditions=analysis["conditions"],
            recommended_action=analysis["action"],
            confidence_score=analysis["confidence"],
            source_experiences=[failed_experience.experience_id]
        )
        
        # Safety verification (do not apply directly)
        safety_check = await self.verify.safety_validation(insight)
        
        if safety_check.approved:
            # Only add to knowledge base after safety verification passes
            await self.knowledge.add_insight(insight)
            self.insights.append(insight)
        
        return insight
    
    async def process_human_feedback(
        self,
        experience_id: str,
        feedback: dict
    ) -> None:
        """
        Process human feedback and update knowledge
        """
        experience = await self.knowledge.get_experience(experience_id)
        experience.human_feedback = feedback
        experience.outcome = ExperienceType.HUMAN_CORRECTION
        
        # Learn from human correction
        insight = await self._learn_from_correction(experience, feedback)
        
        if insight:
            await self.knowledge.add_insight(insight)


class MultiAgentCollaboration:
    """
    Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework
    Core capability of Fujitsu Takane
    """
    
    def __init__(self, agents: list[SelfEvolvingAgent]):
        self.agents = {agent.id: agent for agent in agents}
        self.shared_knowledge = SharedKnowledgeStore()
        self.coordination = AgentCoordinator()
    
    async def execute_complex_task(
        self,
        task: dict,
        agent_roles: dict
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Coordinate multi-agents to execute complex tasks
        """
        # Step 1: Task decomposition
        subtasks = await self._decompose_task(task, agent_roles)
        
        # Step 2: Assign agents
        assignments = self._assign_agents(subtasks, agent_roles)
        
        # Step 3: Execute in parallel
        results = await asyncio.gather(*[
            self._execute_subtask(agent_id, subtask)
            for agent_id, subtask in assignments.items()
        ])
        
        # Step 4: Aggregate results
        aggregated = await self._aggregate_results(results)
        
        # Step 5: Cross-agent knowledge sharing
        await self._share_knowledge(results)
        
        return aggregated
    
    async def _share_knowledge(
        self,
        results: list[dict]
    ) -> None:
        """
        Cross-agent knowledge sharing mechanism
        One agent's experience benefits other agents
        """
        for result in results:
            if "learned_insights" in result:
                for insight in result["learned_insights"]:
                    # Broadcast to all agents
                    for agent in self.agents.values():
                        if insight.is_relevant_to(agent.specialization):
                            await agent.knowledge.add_insight(insight)

4.3 Takane LLM Domain Adaptation Case

# Takane LLM Domain Adaptation Implementation
# Source: Fujitsu Kozuchi AI Platform

class TakaneDomainAdapter:
    """
    Takane Domain Adapter
    Core technology: Continuous learning from business execution results
    """
    
    def __init__(self, base_model, domain: str):
        self.base_model = base_model
        self.domain = domain
        self.performance_history = []
        self.optimization_cycles = 0
    
    async def auto_enhance(
        self,
        training_data: list[dict],
        evaluation_criteria: dict,
        target_improvement: float = 0.1
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Auto-enhance domain-specific model
        Multi-agents collaborate on data selection, training condition adjustment, evaluation, improvement
        """
        print(f"Starting auto-enhancement for {self.domain}")
        
        best_model = self.base_model
        best_accuracy = 0.0
        iteration = 0
        max_iterations = 20
        
        while iteration < max_iterations:
            # Data selection agent
            selected_data = await self._select_training_data(
                training_data,
                current_model=best_model
            )
            
            # Training condition adjustment agent
            training_config = await self._optimize_training_config(
                current_accuracy=best_accuracy,
                target=target_improvement
            )
            
            # Train model
            candidate_model = await self._train_model(
                data=selected_data,
                config=training_config
            )
            
            # Evaluation agent
            evaluation = await self._evaluate_model(
                candidate_model,
                criteria=evaluation_criteria
            )
            
            if evaluation["accuracy"] > best_accuracy:
                best_model = candidate_model
                best_accuracy = evaluation["accuracy"]
                print(f"Iteration {iteration}: New best accuracy = {best_accuracy:.2%}")
            else:
                # Analyze failure
                failure_analysis = await self._analyze_failure(
                    candidate_model,
                    evaluation
                )
                await self._generate_improvement(failure_analysis)
            
            # Check if target reached
            if best_accuracy >= target_improvement:
                break
            
            iteration += 1
        
        return {
            "final_model": best_model,
            "final_accuracy": best_accuracy,
            "iterations": iteration,
            "improvement": best_accuracy - 0.0  # Relative to baseline
        }
    
    async def apply_to_medical_records(
        self,
        unstructured_text: str
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Medical record structured extraction example
        Extract diagnostic names, progression stages, treatment strategies from unstructured medical records
        """
        extraction_prompt = f"""
        Extract structured information from the following medical record:
        
        Raw text:
        {unstructured_text}
        
        Please extract:
        1. Diagnostic name (ICD-10 code)
        2. Disease progression stage (if applicable)
        3. Treatment strategy
        4. Medication regimen
        5. Follow-up plan
        """
        
        result = await self.base_model.generate(extraction_prompt)
        return self._parse_structured_output(result)


# Practical Application Example
async def demonstrate_takane_enhancement():
    """
    Demonstrate Takane auto-enhancement process
    """
    # Initialize
    base_model = load_base_model("gemini-pro")
    adapter = TakaneDomainAdapter(
        base_model=base_model,
        domain="healthcare"
    )
    
    # Load medical data
    medical_records = load_medical_dataset("hospital_records.jsonl")
    
    # Define evaluation criteria
    evaluation_criteria = {
        "diagnostic_accuracy": 0.95,
        "completeness": 0.90,
        "format_correctness": 0.98
    }
    
    # Execute auto-enhancement
    result = await adapter.auto_enhance(
        training_data=medical_records,
        evaluation_criteria=evaluation_criteria,
        target_improvement=0.28  # 28 percentage points improvement reported by Fujitsu
    )
    
    print(f"Final accuracy: {result['final_accuracy']:.2%}")
    print(f"Total iterations: {result['iterations']}")

V. Agentic AI Technology Standards and Ecosystem

5.1 Linux Foundation AI Agent Foundation (AAIF)

In May 2026, the Linux Foundation announced the formation of the AI Agent Foundation (AAIF), a consortium of over 30 tech giants aimed at creating open, universal standards for AI systems.

Founding Member Contributions:

CompanyContributionTechnical Positioning
AnthropicMCP (Model Context Protocol)“USB-C” interface for AI system interoperability
OpenAIAgents.mdAI tool description standardization
BlockGoosePrivacy-preserving offline agent
GoogleAgent tool integrationCross-platform support

5.2 MCP Protocol Implementation

# MCP (Model Context Protocol) Client Implementation
# Source: Anthropic MCP Documentation

from typing import Any
import json

class MCPClient:
    """
    Model Context Protocol client
    Implements universal interoperability between AI systems
    """
    
    def __init__(self, server_url: str, auth_token: str):
        self.server_url = server_url
        self.auth_token = auth_token
        self.tools = []
        self.context_cache = {}
    
    async def connect(self) -> None:
        """Connect to MCP server"""
        async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:
            # Get available tools list
            response = await session.get(
                f"{self.server_url}/tools",
                headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {self.auth_token}"}
            )
            self.tools = await response.json()
    
    async def call_tool(
        self,
        tool_name: str,
        arguments: dict
    ) -> Any:
        """
        Cross-AI system tool calling
        Standardized interface, different AIs can interoperate
        """
        # Normalize request
        mcp_request = {
            "jsonrpc": "2.0",
            "method": "tools/call",
            "params": {
                "name": tool_name,
                "arguments": arguments
            },
            "id": str(uuid.uuid4())
        }
        
        # Send request
        async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:
            response = await session.post(
                f"{self.server_url}/rpc",
                json=mcp_request,
                headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {self.auth_token}"}
            )
            result = await response.json()
        
        return result["result"]
    
    async def share_context(
        self,
        context_type: str,
        data: Any
    ) -> None:
        """
        Cross-AI system context sharing
        Foundation for multi-agent collaboration
        """
        self.context_cache[context_type] = {
            "data": data,
            "timestamp": datetime.now(),
            "source": "mcp_client"
        }
        
        # Broadcast context update
        await self._broadcast_context_update(context_type)


# Cross-platform tool registration example
async def register_cross_platform_tools():
    """Register tools shareable across multiple AI systems"""
    mcp_client = MCPClient(
        server_url="https://mcp.anthropic.com",
        auth_token=os.environ["MCP_TOKEN"]
    )
    await mcp_client.connect()
    
    # Register tool definitions (Agents.md format)
    tools = [
        {
            "name": "search_web",
            "description": "Search the web for information",
            "input_schema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "query": {"type": "string"},
                    "max_results": {"type": "integer"}
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "execute_code",
            "description": "Execute Python code in sandbox",
            "input_schema": {
                "type": "object", 
                "properties": {
                    "code": {"type": "string"},
                    "language": {"type": "string"}
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "read_file",
            "description": "Read a file from filesystem",
            "input_schema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "path": {"type": "string"},
                    "encoding": {"type": "string"}
                }
            }
        }
    ]
    
    for tool in tools:
        await mcp_client.register_tool(tool)

VI. Computer Use Agent Technology

6.1 Microsoft Copilot Studio Computer Use

# Microsoft Copilot Studio Computer Use SDK
# Source: Microsoft TechCommunity (GA: 2026-05-13)

from microsoft.copilot import ComputerUseAgent
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
from microsoft.purview import PurviewClient

class EnterpriseComputerAgent:
    """
    Enterprise-grade Computer Use agent
    Features: Purview logging, Key Vault credentials, Step-by-step billing
    """
    
    def __init__(
        self,
        credentials: DefaultAzureCredential,
        purview_client: PurviewClient
    ):
        self.agent = ComputerUseAgent(
            credential=credentials,
            billing_model="per_step"
        )
        self.purview = purview_client
        self.session_config = {
            "log_to_purview": True,
            "credential_source": "key_vault"
        }
    
    async def execute_automated_workflow(
        self,
        workflow_definition: dict,
        initial_data: dict = None
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Execute automated workflow
        Typical scenario: Complete business process across multiple systems
        """
        # Create session
        session = await self.agent.create_session(
            config=self.session_config
        )
        
        try:
            # Execute workflow steps
            results = []
            current_state = initial_data or {}
            
            for step in workflow_definition["steps"]:
                # Execute single step
                step_result = await session.execute_step(
                    action=step["action"],
                    target=step["target"],
                    parameters=step.get("params", {}),
                    context=current_state
                )
                
                results.append({
                    "step": step["name"],
                    "status": step_result.status,
                    "output": step_result.output
                })
                
                # Update state
                current_state.update(step_result.state_updates)
                
                # Approval check (configurable human review)
                if step.get("require_human_approval"):
                    approval = await self._wait_for_approval(
                        session.id,
                        step_result
                    )
                    if not approval.approved:
                        return {"status": "rejected", "step": step["name"]}
            
            return {
                "status": "completed",
                "results": results,
                "final_state": current_state
            }
            
        finally:
            # Close session (Purview has recorded complete logs)
            await session.close()
    
    async def fill_business_form(
        self,
        form_template: dict,
        data_source: str
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Fill business form example
        Extract information from data source and fill into target system
        """
        workflow = {
            "name": "form_filling_workflow",
            "steps": [
                {
                    "name": "extract_data",
                    "action": "read_document",
                    "target": data_source
                },
                {
                    "name": "parse_information",
                    "action": "extract_fields",
                    "target": "document"
                },
                {
                    "name": "navigate_to_form",
                    "action": "open_url",
                    "target": form_template["url"]
                },
                {
                    "name": "fill_fields",
                    "action": "fill_form",
                    "target": "form",
                    "params": {"fields": form_template["fields"]}
                },
                {
                    "name": "submit",
                    "action": "click_button",
                    "target": "submit_button"
                }
            ]
        }
        
        return await self.execute_automated_workflow(workflow)


# Billing example
def calculate_computer_use_cost(steps_count: int) -> float:
    """
    Calculate Computer Use cost
    Microsoft standard model: 5 Copilot Credits/step
    Approximately $0.04/step (prepaid)
    """
    credits_per_step = 5
    cents_per_credit = 0.008  # $0.008/credit (prepaid plan)
    
    total_cost_cents = steps_count * credits_per_step * cents_per_credit
    return total_cost_cents / 100  # Convert to USD

# Example: 4-step form filling task cost
example_cost = calculate_computer_use_cost(steps_count=4)
print(f"4-step form filling task cost: ${example_cost:.4f}")  # ~$0.0016

6.2 Claude Computer Use with Project Glasswing

# Anthropic Claude Computer Use Implementation
# Source: Anthropic Project Glasswing

from anthropic import Anthropic
from tools import bash, read_file, write_file, browser

class ClaudeComputerAgent:
    """
    Claude Computer Use agent
    Supports browser, filesystem operations
    Secure enterprise deployment with MCP
    """
    
    def __init__(self, api_key: str):
        self.client = Anthropic(api_key=api_key)
        self.available_tools = {
            "bash": bash,
            "read_file": read_file,
            "write_file": write_file,
            "browser": browser
        }
    
    async def execute_with_tools(
        self,
        task: str,
        tool_permissions: list[str] = None
    ) -> dict:
        """
        Claude agent task with tool execution
        """
        # Restrict available tools (security policy)
        allowed_tools = tool_permissions or list(self.available_tools.keys())
        tools = {
            name: self.available_tools[name]
            for name in allowed_tools
        }
        
        # Execute conversation
        message = await self.client.messages.create(
            model="claude-sonnet-4.6",
            max_tokens=4096,
            messages=[
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": task
                }
            ],
            tools=[
                self._format_tool_def(name) 
                for name in allowed_tools
            ]
        )
        
        # Process tool calls
        while message.stop_reason == "tool_use":
            tool_results = []
            
            for tool_use in message.tool_calls:
                tool_name = tool_use.name
                tool_args = tool_use.input
                
                # Execute tool
                result = await self._execute_tool(tool_name, tool_args)
                tool_results.append({
                    "type": "tool_result",
                    "tool_use_id": tool_use.id,
                    "content": result
                })
            
            # Continue conversation
            message = await self.client.messages.create(
                model="claude-sonnet-4.6",
                max_tokens=4096,
                messages=[
                    {"role": "user", "content": task},
                    message.to_dict(),
                    {"role": "user", "content": tool_results}
                ],
                tools=[self._format_tool_def(name) for name in allowed_tools]
            )
        
        return {
            "response": message.content,
            "tool_calls_count": message.usage.total_tokens
        }

VII. Industry Impact and Future Outlook

7.1 Industry Impact of Agentic AI

Google I/O 2026 and other releases this week mark the AI industry entering a new development phase:

Short-term Impact (0-6 months):

  • Enterprise AI workflow automation costs drop significantly
  • Multi-agent systems move from research to production
  • Computer Use agents become standard for enterprise digital transformation

Medium-term Impact (6-18 months):

  • AI Agent ecosystem standardization (MCP/Agents.md)
  • Fundamental changes in search experience
  • AI programming enters mainstream development process

Long-term Impact (18+ months):

  • AI evolves from “assistant tool” to “digital colleague”
  • World models drive physical AI development (robotics, autonomous driving)
  • Self-evolving AI solves professional talent shortage problems

7.2 Technical Challenges and Risks

Technical challenges requiring attention:

  1. Reliability of multi-agent systems: Is the success of 93-agent collaboration reproducible?
  2. Security boundaries: Permission control for Computer Use agents
  3. Auditability: Enterprise compliance requirements
  4. Safety of self-evolving AI: Autonomous learning may cause unexpected behaviors

7.3 Developer Action Recommendations

Immediate Actions (This week):

  1. Evaluate Gemini 3.5 Flash migration possibilities
  2. Try Antigravity 2.0 CLI
  3. Understand MCP protocol ecosystem

Short-term Planning (30 days):

  1. Design multi-agent system architecture patterns
  2. Establish AI agent monitoring and logging mechanisms
  3. Evaluate Copilot Studio enterprise deployment plans

Medium-term Preparation (90 days):

  1. Reassess SEO and content strategies (AI search impact)
  2. Plan AI Agent product integration
  3. Participate in AAIF standard discussions

VIII. Conclusion

Google I/O 2026 showed us the next frontier of AI technology: the Agentic AI Era. In this era, AI is no longer a passive tool for answering questions, but an intelligent agent capable of proactive planning, collaborative execution, and continuous evolution.

Key Technical Takeaways:

  1. Gemini 3.5 Flash: Speed revolution, $1,000 for 2.6 billion tokens
  2. Antigravity 2.0: Multi-agent orchestration platform, 93 agents working in coordination
  3. Gemini Omni: World model, understanding physical laws
  4. Fujitsu Self-Evolution Technology: AI autonomous learning, 28 percentage point accuracy improvement
  5. Computer Use: Cross-system automation, $0.04/step enterprise-grade solution

Ecosystem Building Highlights:

  • MCP Protocol: “USB-C” for AI interoperability
  • Agents.md: Standardization of tool descriptions
  • AAIF: Open standards led by Linux Foundation

The AI Agentic Era has arrived. Developers need to shift from “calling AI APIs” to “designing AI workflows,” from “single interactions” to “continuous collaboration.” This transformation will reshape software engineering practices and redefine the relationship between humans and AI.


References

  1. Google I/O 2026 Official Announcements - https://io.google/2026
  2. Digital Applied - “Eight Stories That Defined the AI Week of May 18-25” (2026-05-25)
  3. Fujitsu - “Self-evolving multi-AI agent technology” (2026-05-25)
  4. Microsoft TechCommunity - “Copilot Studio Computer Use GA” (2026-05-13)
  5. RankMeTop - “Google I/O 2026: The Rise of AI Agents” (2026-05-25)
  6. arXiv - EVE-Agent: Evidence-Verifiable Self-Evolving Agents (2605.22905)
  7. Linux Foundation AI Agent Foundation - https://linuxfoundation.org